As Kentucky marches towards its predicted “college” basketball championship, a lot is being written about the NBA rule requiring players to play one year in college or be 19 years old at the time of the draft.
Without the rule, the NCAA and the media would have an inferior product to sell to basketball fans. Before 2006 they missed out on the likes of LeBron James, Kobe Bryant and Kevin Garnett, but no longer. The real stars coming out of high school since 2006 are required to work for the NCAA for a fraction of their true market value. They are sort of like “indentured servants” earning their right to make a living.
Realistically, these athletes attend college classes for one semester, not one year. If they make the required grades to be eligible, after one semester, why would they continue to attend classes? It doesn’t matter if they lose their college eligibility after March Madness, they simply want to be eligible to play in the NBA.
I don’t know what the average length of an NBA career is, but I can guess that it’s well shy of 10 years. Forcing these athletes to give up one year of potential career earnings is just not right. High school graduates are allowed to join our Military, to fight wars, but too young to play in the NBA? The argument that these “kids” need a year of college basketball falls apart when you look at the roster for this year’s NBA All-Star Game.
The NBA was willing to create the rules because the NCAA provides a cost free farm system. It’s a “win-win.” When I read that John Calipari, the Kentucky coach who openly exploits the “one and done stars,” was critical of the rule, I was impressed. But then I read on and his solution is to have a “two and done” rule. Is he joking or what?
Like most things in our culture, it’s all about the money. And there is nothing wrong with that motivation if it’s a fair deal for all concerned. But this rule does not provide a “win-win” but instead it is a “win-win-lose” arrangement. And you know who the losers are—-it’s the high school stars. But they have no voice. March Madness is great entertainment, but the “one and done” rule imposed on the star players takes a lot of the fun out of it for me. It’s hard to think of it as “college” basketball.
5 responses to ““One and Done””
Heaven forbid they get money from a friend to buy groceries…..
A self evident truth!
Once agan you hit the puck dead center. .
I am a died in the wool UK fan and don’t like the “one and done”; but, have no say in the matter. At UK, all the early departures for the NBA did attend the 2nd semester except one. Players must finish the second semester as students because if they don’t, it counts against the progress toward graduation goals resulting in loss of scholarships.The reason Cal asks for two years is because he knows he can’t get three or four. Leaving early and “chasing dream” has been going on for some time. Arnold Palmer left Wake Forest early as did Tiger Woods from Standford. Little screaming about students leaving early in the individual sports catagories. Would really like to see the rule changed and I think it will, but not in my lifetime!!
I am hopeful it won’t take that long. Regarding Tiger and Arnold, they were free to turn pro without ever attending collge. Anthony Davis and others did not have that option.